Re: [opensuse-wiki] https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Tumbleweed_upgrade

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlmslvUACgkQtTMYHG2NR9UWIwCfepOKLp4rpykcYxzkF7tMHjSv
YWsAnRP9O/ESbvHZNpZSKzqLEimoOS24
=UNOM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
On 2017-09-03 23:01, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 7:18 PM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> Carlos E. R. composed on 2017-08-16 03:44 (UTC+0200):
>>
>>> We still lack official confirmation of what is the alleged "upgrade
>>> workflow" by the assignee with a suse.de address in the bugzilla.
>>
>>> Any upgrade method we document could be said "invalid" and bugs closed.
>>
>>> We need that information before correcting the wiki.
>>
>>> And no, the «"official" offline procedure in the wiki» is not official
>>
>> That's why I stuck 'official' in quotes.
>>
>>> either, as it was me who wrote it - unless it is some other article I'm
>>> not aware of.
>>
>> I'm not sure there is any official online procedure for upgrading from any
>> distribution release to TW. The "official" procedure(s) may be limited to what
>> <https://doc.opensuse.org/documentation/leap/startup/html/book.opensuse.startup/cha.inst.html#sec.i.yast2.method>
>> describes.
>> <https://www.google.com/search?q=upgrade+from+opensuse+distribution+release+to+tumbleweed&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:unofficial>
>> turns up no opensuse.org hits among the first 50.


> Perhaps this issue would get more visibility if it was discussed on
> the opensuse-factory list? I find the opensuse-wiki list is not
> followed closely by those that maintain the package management
> software.

It was asked and ignored:

Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2017 22:00:06 +0200
To: opensuse-factory@opensuse.org
Subject: [opensuse-factory] zypper dup and the "upgrade workflow"


--
Cheers / Saludos,

Carlos E. R.
(from 42.2 x86_64 "Malachite" at Telcontar)